Making sense of Birmingham’s transport funding

Filed under: General

Transport schemes are mainly funded by capital money. This is one-off money and nowadays is typically grants from the government, topped up by Clean Air Zone, bus lane fines and other things like that.

This is different to potholes and running the transport network – business as usual and maintenance – which is funded by revenue money.

This week has seen the publication of two key board papers about capital funding:

The Rosewell Review report answers some questions, but will not conclude until at least autumn.

How did we get to this point?

Before 2022, transport project funding tended to be through a load of different grant pots, often announced as ‘carrots’ within central government autumn budgets.

In 2021, this changed with the creation of a £1.05 billion single pot of money for the West Midlands for five years, between 2022 and 2027. This was called the City Region Sustainable Transport Settlement, or CRSTS. This caught many by surprise and created a list of projects that were top of people’s minds, but were effectively starting from scratch.

Starting from scratch to delivery appears to be a huge challenge to get over the line in five years. And is part of the reason why there are a dozen or so projects that didn’t get around to being fully delivered in time.

On delivery, projects have to go through a whole host of governance, both with the Combined Authority and Local Authorities. Ah, the dreaded business case!

There are several stages:

Once there’s an approved full business case, money can be released and the project can be built.

The business case process has been simplified a bit since 2022 but for smaller walking, cycling and wheeling schemes, local authorities still complain that the process to release funding is too slow.

Going back to funding, there are still random pots of funding around like the Active Travel Fund, which have been brought into a single pot of money called the Integrated Settlement. This pays for smaller projects and we don’t know for how long the government will continue giving it.

And finally, following Rishi Sunak’s cancelling of HS2 Phase 2a and redistribution of money that theoretically doesn’t exist, as well as the Labour government’s rebranding of CRSTS to Transport for City Regions, we’ve now got £2.2 billion to spend between 2027 and 2032.

£2.2 billion might sound like a lot of money! That is, until you realise that pre-commitments and overruns have taken up a good chunk of it. Take £400 million being allocated to transport improvements to enable the Sports Quarter and many millions of pounds for bus franchising. In late 2025, it was revealed that pre-commitments already meant there was only £454 million unallocated.

Any suggestion from the Government that this funding could be used to build expansive tram networks (£135 million to £233 million per mile) should surely be laughed out of the room.

This is separate from some rail schemes like the Midlands Rail Hub, which will build the Bordesley Chords and upgrade Kings Norton, Moor Street and Snow Hill Stations.

Overall – money was a mess, now there’s more of it but it’s still a bit of a mess. And we still need a list of projects that the region wants to fund and build.

The Rosewell Review

Bridget Rosewell was appointed to run a review to help prioritise the region’s schemes and make some recommendations on how to improve delivery.

It turns out the region’s wishlist is 161 projects long and will cost in excess of £5.6 billion. Which means we have a £3.4 billion gap and so need to prioritise.

The criteria for prioritisation is:

Each of the 161 projects have ended up in five categories:

Most of the 2022-27 projects that are outstanding have ended up in categories 2a and 2b. Worryingly one or two, for example the A45 cycle lane extension, projects have ended up in category 5, despite it being due to be built shortly.

Interestingly, it seems like anything in a lower category isn’t a “no”, it’s a “keep developing until there’s a business case to get funding”. So this is truly a wish list that’s going to last for a while. As to whether this list is ambitious enough to be a long term reference point? Not really.


The Rosewell Review is going to continue over the next six months, with additional criteria to help prioritise everything in category 5. It’ll be for all of the owners of the 77 projects in that category to build the case a bit more in order to get prioritised.

Effectively, something being ‘funded’ is the business case being approved and funding being approved, not being announced in a grand package of schemes and then not materialising for a decade. In theory. And as these projects work through this new funding framework piecemeal, it’s difficult to see how it all joins together in a vision.

That lack of vision is in part because the West Midlands Local Transport Plan 5 isn’t adopted yet. But also because the Local Transport Plan will have local implementation plans. And also because we’ve not really ever seen a map of how everything fits together, besides fantasy maps close to elections.

What interesting things are in the longlist?

My highlights are, while trying to figure out what the vague names are – TfWM if you’re reading this, include descriptions please!:

There are also strange things in the longlist that you might expect Network Rail, soon to be Great British Railways to pay for. For example, a new train depot.

Along with this, WMCA wants to use some capital money for business as usual costs instead of new projects. Why is that necessary?

And there are nebulous funding packages, for example a £500 million active travel programme, which could be transformational but there’s very little detail in the public domain at this time.

Again, all of this depends on further prioritisation later this year, and even if it’s a “not right now”, it’s not a “no”. But even a “not right now” could still slow down the delivery of the Birmingham Transport Plan.

Birmingham’s capital programme

The Council produces a capital programme budget as part of its budget setting process. This effectively updates the Birmingham Transportation and Highways Delivery Programme ahead of a more formal update due to Cabinet before the election.

When you overlay the spend for different years, you can see when the Council is currently planning to build things.

So, by March 2029, in theory, we should see the following things either fully built or nearing completion:

Some of the items in the City Council list cross over with items in the Rosewell Review prioritisation list. There’s a chance that some might be deprioritised for now.

Summing up

It feels like an exciting time for Birmingham and the wider region, however it’s hard to see how it all comes together in one overall multi-billion pound improvement programme. What does the comprehensive transport system that enables people to leave their car at home look like? Maybe fantasy maps were good after all!

The test appears to be whether our authorities can deliver more quickly than they have been over the first years of the transport plan.

While both of these items will be discussed at meetings in the next week, it feels as though we can’t get excited over anything new for some time yet.

Page share image photo credit – “Moseley Village Station mini roundabout site on St Mary’s Row” by Elliott Brown, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Martin Price

I'm Chair of Better Streets for Birmingham CIC.

I'm a design consultant interested in system change for transport. I currently work with digital government and have worked with the transport sector.

I live in Frankley (an LTN by design!) and want to see a Birmingham where people have different choices to driving everywhere.